David’s decision demonstrates his commitment to family, duty, and faith in a time of rising tension.
In this passage, Jonathan recounts David’s explanation: “He said, ‘Please let me go, since our family has a sacrifice in the city, and my brother has commanded me to attend. And now, if I have found favor in your sight, please let me get away that I may see my brothers.’ For this reason he has not come to the king’s table.” (v.29). The “city” in question is Bethlehem, located about six miles south of Jerusalem, known later as the birthplace of Jesus (Matthew 2:1). David, the future king of Israel (reigning from around 1010 to 970 BC), seeks permission to join his family for a sacred occasion, emphasizing his sense of familial duty and spiritual devotion. Jonathan, who was the son of King Saul (Israel’s first king, reigning circa 1050-1010 BC), communicates David’s absence to Saul as valid and necessary, hoping to maintain peace between his father and David.
“He said, ‘Please let me go…’” (v.29) highlights the trust David placed in Jonathan to convey the message truthfully, echoing the strong covenant friendship between them (1 Samuel 18:3). David’s request to attend the family sacrifice indicates the continued practice of communal worship, a reminder that the ancestral line from which he came was devout and actively participated in Israel’s religious life. In the broader biblical narrative, Bethlehem’s significance later deepens as the location where God’s promised Messiah, Jesus, would be born (Luke 2:4-7). This ties David’s immediate reason for traveling there to a long-term divine plan unfolding generations later.
Finally, Jonathan’s statement—“For this reason he has not come to the king’s table.” (v.29)—also underscores the tension under King Saul’s roof. Saul’s growing suspicion and anger toward David set a precarious stage. Yet David’s genuine desire to honor his family commitment, rather than insult the king, exemplifies a heart that sought to honor God and tradition. Jonathan’s role as mediator reflects his faithfulness to both his father and his friend, a delicate balance of loyalty that further illuminates the importance of honest communication and trust amidst conflict.
Set to dark mode
1 Samuel 20:29 meaning
In this passage, Jonathan recounts David’s explanation: “He said, ‘Please let me go, since our family has a sacrifice in the city, and my brother has commanded me to attend. And now, if I have found favor in your sight, please let me get away that I may see my brothers.’ For this reason he has not come to the king’s table.” (v.29). The “city” in question is Bethlehem, located about six miles south of Jerusalem, known later as the birthplace of Jesus (Matthew 2:1). David, the future king of Israel (reigning from around 1010 to 970 BC), seeks permission to join his family for a sacred occasion, emphasizing his sense of familial duty and spiritual devotion. Jonathan, who was the son of King Saul (Israel’s first king, reigning circa 1050-1010 BC), communicates David’s absence to Saul as valid and necessary, hoping to maintain peace between his father and David.
“He said, ‘Please let me go…’” (v.29) highlights the trust David placed in Jonathan to convey the message truthfully, echoing the strong covenant friendship between them (1 Samuel 18:3). David’s request to attend the family sacrifice indicates the continued practice of communal worship, a reminder that the ancestral line from which he came was devout and actively participated in Israel’s religious life. In the broader biblical narrative, Bethlehem’s significance later deepens as the location where God’s promised Messiah, Jesus, would be born (Luke 2:4-7). This ties David’s immediate reason for traveling there to a long-term divine plan unfolding generations later.
Finally, Jonathan’s statement—“For this reason he has not come to the king’s table.” (v.29)—also underscores the tension under King Saul’s roof. Saul’s growing suspicion and anger toward David set a precarious stage. Yet David’s genuine desire to honor his family commitment, rather than insult the king, exemplifies a heart that sought to honor God and tradition. Jonathan’s role as mediator reflects his faithfulness to both his father and his friend, a delicate balance of loyalty that further illuminates the importance of honest communication and trust amidst conflict.