Saul believes he has cornered David once and for all, but the situation only affirms how God’s sovereignty protects His servants despite formidable walls or royal power.
“When it was told Saul that David had come to Keilah, Saul said, ‘God has delivered him into my hand, for he shut himself in by entering a city with double gates and bars.’” (1 Samuel 23:7)
In this passage, Saul—who reigned as Israel’s first king around 1050 to 1010 BC—discovers that David has entered the fortified city of Keilah. Believing he has found the perfect trap, Saul exclaims that “God has delivered him into my hand” (v.7). His assumption is that the double gates and strong bars of this city will confine David, preventing any escape. Notably, Saul misapplies or presumes divine favor, having already fallen out of the LORD’s blessing due to disobedience and pride. Earlier portions of 1 Samuel reveal that the Spirit of the LORD had departed from Saul, and he became consumed with jealousy toward David, God’s chosen successor (1 Samuel 16:13-14). Even so, Saul persists in trying to capture the one whom God has anointed to rule.
Keilah itself was a town on the western edge of Judah, positioned in the lowlands known as the Shephelah. As a walled settlement, it appeared to offer a strategic advantage to whoever controlled its gates. Saul sees this as providential: he interprets David’s position within these walls as a sign from God that David is finally trapped. This shows how Saul’s perspective had become twisted by jealousy—he assumes God is on his side, disregarding the reality that David has already been designated by the LORD as the next king. David, for his part, seeks the LORD’s guidance at multiple points, acting in faith rather than presumption, in stark contrast to Saul’s self-serving pursuits.
Despite Saul’s confidence in “double gates and bars,” the events of the larger narrative confirm that a fortified city cannot thwart God’s ultimate plan. David consistently escapes Saul’s grasp and displays a reliance on the LORD’s protection rather than human strength or clever maneuvering. On more than one occasion, David has the chance to harm Saul but refuses, demonstrating restraint, trust, and a recognition that vengeance belongs to God (1 Samuel 24:1-7, 26:1-25;). Saul’s belief that David is divinely “handed over” becomes an ironic illustration: it is not Saul who benefits from God’s saving hand, but rather David, the LORD’s anointed.
Set to dark mode
1 Samuel 23:7 meaning
“When it was told Saul that David had come to Keilah, Saul said, ‘God has delivered him into my hand, for he shut himself in by entering a city with double gates and bars.’” (1 Samuel 23:7)
In this passage, Saul—who reigned as Israel’s first king around 1050 to 1010 BC—discovers that David has entered the fortified city of Keilah. Believing he has found the perfect trap, Saul exclaims that “God has delivered him into my hand” (v.7). His assumption is that the double gates and strong bars of this city will confine David, preventing any escape. Notably, Saul misapplies or presumes divine favor, having already fallen out of the LORD’s blessing due to disobedience and pride. Earlier portions of 1 Samuel reveal that the Spirit of the LORD had departed from Saul, and he became consumed with jealousy toward David, God’s chosen successor (1 Samuel 16:13-14). Even so, Saul persists in trying to capture the one whom God has anointed to rule.
Keilah itself was a town on the western edge of Judah, positioned in the lowlands known as the Shephelah. As a walled settlement, it appeared to offer a strategic advantage to whoever controlled its gates. Saul sees this as providential: he interprets David’s position within these walls as a sign from God that David is finally trapped. This shows how Saul’s perspective had become twisted by jealousy—he assumes God is on his side, disregarding the reality that David has already been designated by the LORD as the next king. David, for his part, seeks the LORD’s guidance at multiple points, acting in faith rather than presumption, in stark contrast to Saul’s self-serving pursuits.
Despite Saul’s confidence in “double gates and bars,” the events of the larger narrative confirm that a fortified city cannot thwart God’s ultimate plan. David consistently escapes Saul’s grasp and displays a reliance on the LORD’s protection rather than human strength or clever maneuvering. On more than one occasion, David has the chance to harm Saul but refuses, demonstrating restraint, trust, and a recognition that vengeance belongs to God (1 Samuel 24:1-7, 26:1-25;). Saul’s belief that David is divinely “handed over” becomes an ironic illustration: it is not Saul who benefits from God’s saving hand, but rather David, the LORD’s anointed.