God ensured fair and precise instructions for all offerings and sacrifices.
“The money from the guilt offerings and the money from the sin offerings was not brought into the house of the Lord; it was for the priests.” (2 Kings 12:16) In this verse, we learn that during the time of King Joash (also called Jehoash), “the money from the guilt offerings and the money from the sin offerings was not brought into the house of the Lord” (v.16). Historically, Joash ruled the Kingdom of Judah around 835-796 BC and oversaw significant repairs to the temple in Jerusalem. Jerusalem, the holy city of the kingdom, was located in the southern region, and it was there that Solomon’s Temple—“the house of the Lord”—stood.
By specifying that “it was for the priests” (v.16), the passage clarifies the priests’ role in receiving certain offerings. Under the Mosaic Law, guilt and sin offerings were partly given to the priesthood to support them (Leviticus 7:7). This provision ensured that the priests’ spiritual labor, including the carrying out of sacrifices, would be maintained. Within the historical timeline, these responsibilities align with Israel’s priesthood lineage descending from Aaron, who served under Moses in the mid-fifteenth century BC.
In the broader context, this distinction in how the priestly portions of offerings were managed highlights God’s emphasis on order and provision for His ministers. It also points forward to the ultimate fulfillment of sacrificial offerings found in Christ, who became the once-for-all offering (Hebrews 10:10). Thus, the verse underscores God’s system of worship, care for the priesthood, and a foretaste of the perfect sacrifice in Jesus.
Set to dark mode
2 Kings 12:16 meaning
“The money from the guilt offerings and the money from the sin offerings was not brought into the house of the Lord; it was for the priests.” (2 Kings 12:16) In this verse, we learn that during the time of King Joash (also called Jehoash), “the money from the guilt offerings and the money from the sin offerings was not brought into the house of the Lord” (v.16). Historically, Joash ruled the Kingdom of Judah around 835-796 BC and oversaw significant repairs to the temple in Jerusalem. Jerusalem, the holy city of the kingdom, was located in the southern region, and it was there that Solomon’s Temple—“the house of the Lord”—stood.
By specifying that “it was for the priests” (v.16), the passage clarifies the priests’ role in receiving certain offerings. Under the Mosaic Law, guilt and sin offerings were partly given to the priesthood to support them (Leviticus 7:7). This provision ensured that the priests’ spiritual labor, including the carrying out of sacrifices, would be maintained. Within the historical timeline, these responsibilities align with Israel’s priesthood lineage descending from Aaron, who served under Moses in the mid-fifteenth century BC.
In the broader context, this distinction in how the priestly portions of offerings were managed highlights God’s emphasis on order and provision for His ministers. It also points forward to the ultimate fulfillment of sacrificial offerings found in Christ, who became the once-for-all offering (Hebrews 10:10). Thus, the verse underscores God’s system of worship, care for the priesthood, and a foretaste of the perfect sacrifice in Jesus.