Hoshea’s nine-year rule ended in captivity and marked the beginning of the collapse of the northern kingdom of Israel.
“In the twelfth year of Ahaz king of Judah, Hoshea the son of Elah became king over Israel in Samaria, and reigned nine years.” (v.1) This opening of 2 Kings 17 sets the stage by telling us precisely when Hoshea took the throne in comparison to Ahaz, who was ruling over Judah at the time (approximately 732-716 BC). By connecting Hoshea’s kingship in the twelfth year of Ahaz king of Judah, the text highlights the continued division between the northern kingdom (Israel) and the southern kingdom (Judah). The verse also explicitly locates the seat of Hoshea’s rule in Samaria, the capital city established by King Omri centuries earlier, situated on a hill some 40 miles north of Jerusalem. That center of political life in the north would soon become the focal point of foreign conflicts and eventual conquest.
When we read that Hoshea the son of Elah became king over Israel in Samaria, and reigned nine years (v.1), we are introduced to a final major turning point in the history of the northern kingdom. Hoshea, reigning roughly from 732 BC to 722 BC, was Israel’s last king before the Assyrian Empire conquered Samaria (2 Kings 17:6). This conquest led to the dispersion and captivity known as the “Lost Tribes” of Israel. From a historical standpoint, Hoshea’s short reign shows how the political intrigues and attempts to form alliances with surrounding powers (such as Egypt or the Assyrians themselves) often ended in disaster for the kings of Israel. The destructive outcomes not only affected the royal household, but also signified the deeper spiritual straying of the nation—something repeatedly condemned by the prophets of the Old Testament.
In the broader context of Scripture, Jesus later passed through Samaria (John 4) and spoke of God’s plan for redemption beyond cultural and historical boundaries. While Hoshea’s reign was characterized by conflict and ultimately the downfall of the northern kingdom, we see the continuation of a redemptive thread in the New Testament, as Jesus’ ministry included those land areas once under Hoshea’s rule. Hoshea’s tenure is a stark reminder that a departure from the path God provided—through covenant fidelity—leads to loss and exile, while trust in the promises God made through Abraham, David, and ultimately fulfilled in Christ offers hope despite the darkest moments.
Set to dark mode
2 Kings 17:1 meaning
“In the twelfth year of Ahaz king of Judah, Hoshea the son of Elah became king over Israel in Samaria, and reigned nine years.” (v.1) This opening of 2 Kings 17 sets the stage by telling us precisely when Hoshea took the throne in comparison to Ahaz, who was ruling over Judah at the time (approximately 732-716 BC). By connecting Hoshea’s kingship in the twelfth year of Ahaz king of Judah, the text highlights the continued division between the northern kingdom (Israel) and the southern kingdom (Judah). The verse also explicitly locates the seat of Hoshea’s rule in Samaria, the capital city established by King Omri centuries earlier, situated on a hill some 40 miles north of Jerusalem. That center of political life in the north would soon become the focal point of foreign conflicts and eventual conquest.
When we read that Hoshea the son of Elah became king over Israel in Samaria, and reigned nine years (v.1), we are introduced to a final major turning point in the history of the northern kingdom. Hoshea, reigning roughly from 732 BC to 722 BC, was Israel’s last king before the Assyrian Empire conquered Samaria (2 Kings 17:6). This conquest led to the dispersion and captivity known as the “Lost Tribes” of Israel. From a historical standpoint, Hoshea’s short reign shows how the political intrigues and attempts to form alliances with surrounding powers (such as Egypt or the Assyrians themselves) often ended in disaster for the kings of Israel. The destructive outcomes not only affected the royal household, but also signified the deeper spiritual straying of the nation—something repeatedly condemned by the prophets of the Old Testament.
In the broader context of Scripture, Jesus later passed through Samaria (John 4) and spoke of God’s plan for redemption beyond cultural and historical boundaries. While Hoshea’s reign was characterized by conflict and ultimately the downfall of the northern kingdom, we see the continuation of a redemptive thread in the New Testament, as Jesus’ ministry included those land areas once under Hoshea’s rule. Hoshea’s tenure is a stark reminder that a departure from the path God provided—through covenant fidelity—leads to loss and exile, while trust in the promises God made through Abraham, David, and ultimately fulfilled in Christ offers hope despite the darkest moments.