Pharaoh Neco’s interference in Judah’s monarchy serves to remind us of how God can use even foreign rulers to accomplish His plan.
“Pharaoh Neco made Eliakim the son of Josiah king in the place of Josiah his father and changed his name to Jehoiakim. But he took Jehoahaz away and brought him to Egypt, and he died there.” (2 Kings 23:34) This passage introduces a critical shift in Judah’s monarchy after the death of King Josiah (640-609 BC). Pharaoh Neco, who reigned in Egypt from approximately 610 to 595 BC, exerted his power to remove Jehoahaz and install Eliakim as the king. Jehoahaz was another of Josiah’s sons, and he had only briefly ruled Judah before Pharaoh Neco took him captive. This highlights Egypt’s influence over the region, underscoring how the fate of Judah’s kings was heavily influenced by foreign powers. The reference to Egypt, a land situated in the northeastern corner of Africa along the Nile River, demonstrates the reach of international politics during this time in biblical history.
By changing Eliakim’s name to Jehoiakim, the Egyptian Pharaoh effectively showed his dominance and control over Judah’s affairs. In Scripture, a change of name often symbolizes a shift in allegiance, role, or destiny (see how Nebuchadnezzar changed the names of Daniel and his friends in Daniel 1:7 for another example). Jehoiakim’s acceptance of this new name indicated his submission to Pharaoh Neco’s authority. However, it would also foreshadow the tenuous stability of Judah, as Jehoiakim’s reign (609-598 BC) took place amid growing pressure from larger empires like Egypt and Babylon.
The tragic note that Jehoahaz “died there,” referring to Egypt, highlights the cost of resisting the power of Pharaoh Neco. It reminds readers of the fleeting nature of royal favor when confronted with shifting international alliances. God’s sovereignty looms over these political machinations, as ultimately the fate of Judah would be fulfilled in accordance with prophecy and the covenant responsibilities placed upon its leaders (Jeremiah 22:11-12 also references Jehoahaz’s captivity, thereby confirming this swift end to his rule). Despite these events happening centuries before the birth of Christ, they point to the overarching theme of God’s authority over the nations, which the New Testament reaffirms in passages like Matthew 28:18.
Set to dark mode
2 Kings 23:34 meaning
“Pharaoh Neco made Eliakim the son of Josiah king in the place of Josiah his father and changed his name to Jehoiakim. But he took Jehoahaz away and brought him to Egypt, and he died there.” (2 Kings 23:34) This passage introduces a critical shift in Judah’s monarchy after the death of King Josiah (640-609 BC). Pharaoh Neco, who reigned in Egypt from approximately 610 to 595 BC, exerted his power to remove Jehoahaz and install Eliakim as the king. Jehoahaz was another of Josiah’s sons, and he had only briefly ruled Judah before Pharaoh Neco took him captive. This highlights Egypt’s influence over the region, underscoring how the fate of Judah’s kings was heavily influenced by foreign powers. The reference to Egypt, a land situated in the northeastern corner of Africa along the Nile River, demonstrates the reach of international politics during this time in biblical history.
By changing Eliakim’s name to Jehoiakim, the Egyptian Pharaoh effectively showed his dominance and control over Judah’s affairs. In Scripture, a change of name often symbolizes a shift in allegiance, role, or destiny (see how Nebuchadnezzar changed the names of Daniel and his friends in Daniel 1:7 for another example). Jehoiakim’s acceptance of this new name indicated his submission to Pharaoh Neco’s authority. However, it would also foreshadow the tenuous stability of Judah, as Jehoiakim’s reign (609-598 BC) took place amid growing pressure from larger empires like Egypt and Babylon.
The tragic note that Jehoahaz “died there,” referring to Egypt, highlights the cost of resisting the power of Pharaoh Neco. It reminds readers of the fleeting nature of royal favor when confronted with shifting international alliances. God’s sovereignty looms over these political machinations, as ultimately the fate of Judah would be fulfilled in accordance with prophecy and the covenant responsibilities placed upon its leaders (Jeremiah 22:11-12 also references Jehoahaz’s captivity, thereby confirming this swift end to his rule). Despite these events happening centuries before the birth of Christ, they point to the overarching theme of God’s authority over the nations, which the New Testament reaffirms in passages like Matthew 28:18.