This verse shows how a community’s desire for partnership can be misused if commitments are not grounded in truth.
So Hamor and his son Shechem came to the gate of their city and spoke to the men of their city, saying, (v.20). In ancient times, the city gate served as a central place for conducting official and judicial business, so it was fitting for Hamor, the father of Shechem, to gather the local men there. The purpose of this meeting was to gain the city’s approval for an alliance between Jacob’s family and the people of Shechem. Historically placed around the early second millennium BC, Hamor was a local Hivite ruler (Genesis 34:2) in the region of Canaan, and Shechem not only referred to the man who was his son but also to the city itself. This city was situated in the central hill country of Canaan, strategically located between Mount Ebal and Mount Gerizim, about forty miles north of modern-day Jerusalem.
By coming to the gate, Hamor and Shechem appealed to the sense of civic duty and communal prosperity that often governed the ancient Near Eastern city-state. Their speech to the men was intended to encourage them to accept Jacob’s family—particularly by agreeing to the outward covenant sign of circumcision (Genesis 34:22)—in return for economic and marital benefits. From a broader perspective of Genesis 34, however, the deceptive scheme by Jacob’s sons was already in motion. The negotiations highlighted in this verse reflect the tension between outward agreements and hidden intentions: while Hamor and Shechem sought a peaceful merging of peoples, certain sons of Jacob used the terms of agreement as a cover for vengeance.
In the larger biblical narrative, Shechem’s significance recurs throughout Scripture as a key location for covenants, gatherings, and pivotal events (Joshua 24:1; Judges 9:6). Generations later, it would also be recognized as a city of refuge, symbolizing the possibility of protection and new beginnings. Yet here in Genesis 34, the promise of agreement is overshadowed by looming tragedy, as the city gate discourse ultimately leads to consequences brought about by dishonesty and unrestrained violence.
Set to dark mode
Genesis 34:20 meaning
So Hamor and his son Shechem came to the gate of their city and spoke to the men of their city, saying, (v.20). In ancient times, the city gate served as a central place for conducting official and judicial business, so it was fitting for Hamor, the father of Shechem, to gather the local men there. The purpose of this meeting was to gain the city’s approval for an alliance between Jacob’s family and the people of Shechem. Historically placed around the early second millennium BC, Hamor was a local Hivite ruler (Genesis 34:2) in the region of Canaan, and Shechem not only referred to the man who was his son but also to the city itself. This city was situated in the central hill country of Canaan, strategically located between Mount Ebal and Mount Gerizim, about forty miles north of modern-day Jerusalem.
By coming to the gate, Hamor and Shechem appealed to the sense of civic duty and communal prosperity that often governed the ancient Near Eastern city-state. Their speech to the men was intended to encourage them to accept Jacob’s family—particularly by agreeing to the outward covenant sign of circumcision (Genesis 34:22)—in return for economic and marital benefits. From a broader perspective of Genesis 34, however, the deceptive scheme by Jacob’s sons was already in motion. The negotiations highlighted in this verse reflect the tension between outward agreements and hidden intentions: while Hamor and Shechem sought a peaceful merging of peoples, certain sons of Jacob used the terms of agreement as a cover for vengeance.
In the larger biblical narrative, Shechem’s significance recurs throughout Scripture as a key location for covenants, gatherings, and pivotal events (Joshua 24:1; Judges 9:6). Generations later, it would also be recognized as a city of refuge, symbolizing the possibility of protection and new beginnings. Yet here in Genesis 34, the promise of agreement is overshadowed by looming tragedy, as the city gate discourse ultimately leads to consequences brought about by dishonesty and unrestrained violence.