Their pursuit of a permanent home during a time when Israel had no king reveals an ongoing quest for security that can be traced throughout biblical history.
In Judges 18:1, we learn that in those days, there was no centralized ruler to unify God’s people. The verse records that “In those days there was no king of Israel; and in those days the tribe of the Danites was seeking an inheritance for themselves to live in, for until that day an inheritance had not been allotted to them as a possession among the tribes of Israel” (v.1). This statement situates the reader in a period of political and spiritual instability, where each tribe often pursued their own course. The tribe of the Danites was specifically looking for a place to settle because an inheritance had not been allotted to them as a possession. Historically, the tribe of Dan finds its origin in Jacob’s son Dan, who was born to Bilhah, Rachel’s maid (Genesis 30:4-6). Over time, the Danites struggled to secure the land initially granted them and ultimately migrated North (Judges 18:27-29). In the timeline, these events took place sometime after the conquest under Joshua (around the 14th century BC), yet before the establishment of kings (beginning around 1050 BC with Saul).
When the verse says there was no king of Israel (v.1), it underscores Israel’s tendency to do what was right in their own eyes (Judges 17:6), producing repeated cycles of sin and disunity. Without a central authority, many tribes, like Dan, had difficulty solidifying their territorial inheritance. As a result, the Danites went searching for a new piece of land that would be easier to inhabit. Although the text points out an inheritance had not been allotted to Dan, the broader context suggests they had not been able to retain or fully control the original territory assigned to them. The city of Dan, located near the base of Mount Hermon in the north, eventually became the tribe’s resting place (Genesis 14:14; Deuteronomy 34:1); but with this migration, they also introduced idolatry, placing a stumbling block for Israel in future generations (Judges 18:30-31).
Furthermore, seeking a new inheritance embodies Israel’s repeated failure to rely on the LORD’s power fully. The Danites’ quest typifies the broader human challenge of finding rest, a theme echoed in the New Testament by those seeking Jesus as the ultimate source of spiritual rest (Matthew 11:28-30). Throughout Scripture, the motif of “inheritance” culminates in the spiritual inheritance promised through faith (Ephesians 1:11). Where the tribe of Dan sought land physically, the New Testament invites believers to seek an eternal inheritance through Christ (Romans 8:16-17).
In summary, this verse highlights that the tribe of Dan lacked a secure inheritance and took matters into their own hands in a leaderless era, illustrating the precarious moral and military climate of Israel at that time.
Set to dark mode
Judges 18:1 meaning
In Judges 18:1, we learn that in those days, there was no centralized ruler to unify God’s people. The verse records that “In those days there was no king of Israel; and in those days the tribe of the Danites was seeking an inheritance for themselves to live in, for until that day an inheritance had not been allotted to them as a possession among the tribes of Israel” (v.1). This statement situates the reader in a period of political and spiritual instability, where each tribe often pursued their own course. The tribe of the Danites was specifically looking for a place to settle because an inheritance had not been allotted to them as a possession. Historically, the tribe of Dan finds its origin in Jacob’s son Dan, who was born to Bilhah, Rachel’s maid (Genesis 30:4-6). Over time, the Danites struggled to secure the land initially granted them and ultimately migrated North (Judges 18:27-29). In the timeline, these events took place sometime after the conquest under Joshua (around the 14th century BC), yet before the establishment of kings (beginning around 1050 BC with Saul).
When the verse says there was no king of Israel (v.1), it underscores Israel’s tendency to do what was right in their own eyes (Judges 17:6), producing repeated cycles of sin and disunity. Without a central authority, many tribes, like Dan, had difficulty solidifying their territorial inheritance. As a result, the Danites went searching for a new piece of land that would be easier to inhabit. Although the text points out an inheritance had not been allotted to Dan, the broader context suggests they had not been able to retain or fully control the original territory assigned to them. The city of Dan, located near the base of Mount Hermon in the north, eventually became the tribe’s resting place (Genesis 14:14; Deuteronomy 34:1); but with this migration, they also introduced idolatry, placing a stumbling block for Israel in future generations (Judges 18:30-31).
Furthermore, seeking a new inheritance embodies Israel’s repeated failure to rely on the LORD’s power fully. The Danites’ quest typifies the broader human challenge of finding rest, a theme echoed in the New Testament by those seeking Jesus as the ultimate source of spiritual rest (Matthew 11:28-30). Throughout Scripture, the motif of “inheritance” culminates in the spiritual inheritance promised through faith (Ephesians 1:11). Where the tribe of Dan sought land physically, the New Testament invites believers to seek an eternal inheritance through Christ (Romans 8:16-17).
In summary, this verse highlights that the tribe of Dan lacked a secure inheritance and took matters into their own hands in a leaderless era, illustrating the precarious moral and military climate of Israel at that time.