This verse illustrates how human assumptions about suffering can lead to false accusations and deepen the very pain they seek to remedy.
Eliphaz, one of Job’s friends from Teman, levels a series of accusations against Job in chapter 22, suggesting that Job’s troubles prove hidden sin in his life. In the midst of his indictment, he declares, “For you have taken pledges of your brothers without cause, And stripped men naked” (v.6). This claim implies Job has used his influence to extort others, seizing what little they had and leaving them destitute. Eliphaz’s words fit his broader assumption that Job’s suffering must be a punishment for wrongdoing, a reflection of the widespread but erroneous belief that tragic consequences always imply hidden or unconfessed sin.
In reality, Eliphaz’s charges are part of the flawed counsel Job’s three friends offer throughout this book. Although they mean to help, they fail to understand God’s ways and characterize Him as transactional—if Job were righteous, they reason, he wouldn’t encounter hardship. In verse 6, Eliphaz specifically attacks Job’s character by accusing him of greed and cruelty. This forceful condemnation is both unfair and untrue, as the wider context of Scripture affirms Job’s uprightness (Job 1:1), and later God Himself rebukes the friends for misrepresenting His ways.
By levying this charge, Eliphaz tries to force a confession out of Job, believing that restoration will only come once Job admits guilt. Ironically, the friends have it backward, because Job’s heart remains faithful throughout his ordeal. Their misguided accusations in verses like this one highlight how easy it can be to judge unjustly without knowing God’s greater plan or the full reality of someone’s situation.
Set to dark mode
Job 22:6 meaning
Eliphaz, one of Job’s friends from Teman, levels a series of accusations against Job in chapter 22, suggesting that Job’s troubles prove hidden sin in his life. In the midst of his indictment, he declares, “For you have taken pledges of your brothers without cause, And stripped men naked” (v.6). This claim implies Job has used his influence to extort others, seizing what little they had and leaving them destitute. Eliphaz’s words fit his broader assumption that Job’s suffering must be a punishment for wrongdoing, a reflection of the widespread but erroneous belief that tragic consequences always imply hidden or unconfessed sin.
In reality, Eliphaz’s charges are part of the flawed counsel Job’s three friends offer throughout this book. Although they mean to help, they fail to understand God’s ways and characterize Him as transactional—if Job were righteous, they reason, he wouldn’t encounter hardship. In verse 6, Eliphaz specifically attacks Job’s character by accusing him of greed and cruelty. This forceful condemnation is both unfair and untrue, as the wider context of Scripture affirms Job’s uprightness (Job 1:1), and later God Himself rebukes the friends for misrepresenting His ways.
By levying this charge, Eliphaz tries to force a confession out of Job, believing that restoration will only come once Job admits guilt. Ironically, the friends have it backward, because Job’s heart remains faithful throughout his ordeal. Their misguided accusations in verses like this one highlight how easy it can be to judge unjustly without knowing God’s greater plan or the full reality of someone’s situation.