Job 31:11 warns that lust and unfaithfulness are never trivial, but rather are serious breaches of both divine authority and human trust.
Job declares, “For that would be a lustful crime; moreover, it would be an iniquity punishable by judges” (v.11) as part of his solemn vows concerning personal morality. In the broader context of Job 31, he is defending his integrity by listing hypothetical sins he has avoided, one of them being sexual immorality. Though Job lived in the ancient land of Uz (likely around the time of the patriarchs, circa 2000-1800 BC), he recognizes that lust and marital unfaithfulness are grave offenses, worthy of censure. His language underscores a deep conviction that even the desire behind an act matters in God’s sight, reflecting an internal moral code that predates the official Levitical law.
By describing this sin as “a lustful crime”, Job shows that sexual immorality is a spiritual violation against others and against God. From a biblical perspective, physical intimacy is meant to express unity, not exploitation; when it is misused, it tears at the heart and corrodes the soul. Job’s emphasis on consequences “punishable by judges” points to the seriousness with which he believes communities should condemn such transgressions, revealing his stance that private impurity invariably affects public well-being as well.
Job’s standard of moral purity anticipates later exhortations in Scripture, where the state of one’s heart is shown to be foundational (Matthew 5:27-28). In keeping with Jesus’ teaching on adultery, Job’s earnest protest suggests that avoiding sin is not merely about restraining outward actions but also surrendering inward desires to God’s righteous standard. Even as he endures profound suffering and confusion, Job refuses to engage in or excuse any wrongdoing of the heart.
Set to dark mode
Job 31:11 meaning
Job declares, “For that would be a lustful crime; moreover, it would be an iniquity punishable by judges” (v.11) as part of his solemn vows concerning personal morality. In the broader context of Job 31, he is defending his integrity by listing hypothetical sins he has avoided, one of them being sexual immorality. Though Job lived in the ancient land of Uz (likely around the time of the patriarchs, circa 2000-1800 BC), he recognizes that lust and marital unfaithfulness are grave offenses, worthy of censure. His language underscores a deep conviction that even the desire behind an act matters in God’s sight, reflecting an internal moral code that predates the official Levitical law.
By describing this sin as “a lustful crime”, Job shows that sexual immorality is a spiritual violation against others and against God. From a biblical perspective, physical intimacy is meant to express unity, not exploitation; when it is misused, it tears at the heart and corrodes the soul. Job’s emphasis on consequences “punishable by judges” points to the seriousness with which he believes communities should condemn such transgressions, revealing his stance that private impurity invariably affects public well-being as well.
Job’s standard of moral purity anticipates later exhortations in Scripture, where the state of one’s heart is shown to be foundational (Matthew 5:27-28). In keeping with Jesus’ teaching on adultery, Job’s earnest protest suggests that avoiding sin is not merely about restraining outward actions but also surrendering inward desires to God’s righteous standard. Even as he endures profound suffering and confusion, Job refuses to engage in or excuse any wrongdoing of the heart.