Despite God’s provision of land, Manasseh’s partial obedience allowed the Canaanites to remain, resulting in continuous conflict and spiritual compromise for Israel.
“But the sons of Manasseh could not take possession of these cities, because the Canaanites persisted in living in that land.” (v. 12)
This verse describes the difficulty the tribe of Manasseh, a son of Joseph who lived around the 17th century BC (Genesis 30-50 records Joseph’s life), faced in fully possessing the territory assigned to them in the Promised Land. The tribe of Manasseh was one of the twelve tribes of Israel, and part of their land allotment lay west of the Jordan River, in the heart of Canaan. The phrase “the Canaanites persisted in living in that land” (v. 12) implies that despite previous victories under Joshua (who lived around the late 15th century BC, approximately 1400-1370 BC), the Israelites did not fully drive out the native peoples. This detail highlights a reoccurring theme in the Book of Joshua: God’s people, though miraculously delivered and led, struggled with incomplete obedience, leaving pockets of Canaanite influence in their allotted territories. Over time, this partial obedience became a stumbling block, as foreign inhabitants and idols continued to pose a spiritual and practical challenge to Israel's faithfulness (Judges 1:27, Judges 2:2-3).
In geographical terms, the territory of Manasseh was in central West Palestine (Canaan) and included plains and fertile valleys stretching into strategic sites such as Beth-shean, Ibleam, and Megiddo. Because these regions had established Canaanite populations with iron chariots and fortified defenses, the Israelites could not fully expel them (Joshua 17:16, Judges 1:27). The mention of the Canaanites persisting in living there indicates their resilience and also underscores Israel’s decision at times to place the Canaanites under forced labor instead of fully removing them, which was counter to God’s original command (Deuteronomy 20:16-18). That partial compliance eventually led to idolatrous influences, showing how incomplete conquest could bring spiritual compromise.
From a theological standpoint, this verse also reminds us that God’s promises of blessing for His people often require active trust and obedience, rather than passivity. Just as Jesus, centuries later, would call believers to fully remove sin or compromise from their lives (Matthew 18:8-9), here the Israelites’ refusal or inability to usher the Canaanites out places them in an ongoing struggle. This persistent presence of the Canaanites foreshadows many of the conflicts that fill the Book of Judges, revealing the consequences of partial obedience.
The tribe of Manasseh thus stands as an example within Joshua 17:12: though they inherited the promise, their incomplete follow-through prevents them from fully enjoying the blessings of the land.
They did not fully drive out the inhabitants, leaving themselves vulnerable to ongoing warfare and idolatrous influences.
Set to dark mode
Joshua 17:12 meaning
“But the sons of Manasseh could not take possession of these cities, because the Canaanites persisted in living in that land.” (v. 12)
This verse describes the difficulty the tribe of Manasseh, a son of Joseph who lived around the 17th century BC (Genesis 30-50 records Joseph’s life), faced in fully possessing the territory assigned to them in the Promised Land. The tribe of Manasseh was one of the twelve tribes of Israel, and part of their land allotment lay west of the Jordan River, in the heart of Canaan. The phrase “the Canaanites persisted in living in that land” (v. 12) implies that despite previous victories under Joshua (who lived around the late 15th century BC, approximately 1400-1370 BC), the Israelites did not fully drive out the native peoples. This detail highlights a reoccurring theme in the Book of Joshua: God’s people, though miraculously delivered and led, struggled with incomplete obedience, leaving pockets of Canaanite influence in their allotted territories. Over time, this partial obedience became a stumbling block, as foreign inhabitants and idols continued to pose a spiritual and practical challenge to Israel's faithfulness (Judges 1:27, Judges 2:2-3).
In geographical terms, the territory of Manasseh was in central West Palestine (Canaan) and included plains and fertile valleys stretching into strategic sites such as Beth-shean, Ibleam, and Megiddo. Because these regions had established Canaanite populations with iron chariots and fortified defenses, the Israelites could not fully expel them (Joshua 17:16, Judges 1:27). The mention of the Canaanites persisting in living there indicates their resilience and also underscores Israel’s decision at times to place the Canaanites under forced labor instead of fully removing them, which was counter to God’s original command (Deuteronomy 20:16-18). That partial compliance eventually led to idolatrous influences, showing how incomplete conquest could bring spiritual compromise.
From a theological standpoint, this verse also reminds us that God’s promises of blessing for His people often require active trust and obedience, rather than passivity. Just as Jesus, centuries later, would call believers to fully remove sin or compromise from their lives (Matthew 18:8-9), here the Israelites’ refusal or inability to usher the Canaanites out places them in an ongoing struggle. This persistent presence of the Canaanites foreshadows many of the conflicts that fill the Book of Judges, revealing the consequences of partial obedience.
The tribe of Manasseh thus stands as an example within Joshua 17:12: though they inherited the promise, their incomplete follow-through prevents them from fully enjoying the blessings of the land.
They did not fully drive out the inhabitants, leaving themselves vulnerable to ongoing warfare and idolatrous influences.