In Joshua 17:13, the scripture recounts, “It came about when the sons of Israel became strong, they put the Canaanites to forced labor, but they did not drive them out completely” (v.13). This verse describes a moment in Israel’s history once they had established enough power in the newly acquired Promised Land to dominate the native Canaanite population. However, rather than removing the remaining inhabitants completely as God had instructed, they settled for a partial conquest. The land of Canaan, located in the region covering much of present-day Israel, the West Bank, Gaza, and surrounding areas, served as the inheritance promised to the people of Israel. This partial subjugation contributed to ongoing cultural and spiritual tension in later generations, showing the shifting allegiances and temptations that came from not obeying God fully (see Judges 1:27-29).
By saying, “they put the Canaanites to forced labor” (v.13), the text underscores the Israelites’ ability to assert political and economic control over the native population. Although they had the upper hand, they chose to exploit the Canaanites’ labor rather than carrying out God’s directive to purge the land of false worship systems that might lead Israel astray in devotion to the LORD. Their decision to coexist with the locals in this way, though strategically or economically beneficial at the time, led to long-term challenges. Repeatedly, the Bible warns about the pervasive risk of adopting the idolatrous practices of surrounding cultures (1 Kings 11:1-11), a warning famously echoed in the ministry and words of Jesus when He called His followers to be distinct in conduct and worship (Matthew 5:14-16).
The omission in “they did not drive them out completely” (v.13) is instructive for later generations. It is a reminder that partial obedience often leads to future complications. Although the command for Israel to remove foreign influences was specific to that stage of redemptive history, the principle of wholehearted dedication resonates for believers through the teachings of Christ, who invites His disciples to surrender everything to God’s lordship (Luke 14:33). In failing to do so, Israel would see that incomplete obedience allowed the seeds of compromise to take root and, in due course, influence their national destiny.
Set to dark mode
Joshua 17:13 meaning
In Joshua 17:13, the scripture recounts, “It came about when the sons of Israel became strong, they put the Canaanites to forced labor, but they did not drive them out completely” (v.13). This verse describes a moment in Israel’s history once they had established enough power in the newly acquired Promised Land to dominate the native Canaanite population. However, rather than removing the remaining inhabitants completely as God had instructed, they settled for a partial conquest. The land of Canaan, located in the region covering much of present-day Israel, the West Bank, Gaza, and surrounding areas, served as the inheritance promised to the people of Israel. This partial subjugation contributed to ongoing cultural and spiritual tension in later generations, showing the shifting allegiances and temptations that came from not obeying God fully (see Judges 1:27-29).
By saying, “they put the Canaanites to forced labor” (v.13), the text underscores the Israelites’ ability to assert political and economic control over the native population. Although they had the upper hand, they chose to exploit the Canaanites’ labor rather than carrying out God’s directive to purge the land of false worship systems that might lead Israel astray in devotion to the LORD. Their decision to coexist with the locals in this way, though strategically or economically beneficial at the time, led to long-term challenges. Repeatedly, the Bible warns about the pervasive risk of adopting the idolatrous practices of surrounding cultures (1 Kings 11:1-11), a warning famously echoed in the ministry and words of Jesus when He called His followers to be distinct in conduct and worship (Matthew 5:14-16).
The omission in “they did not drive them out completely” (v.13) is instructive for later generations. It is a reminder that partial obedience often leads to future complications. Although the command for Israel to remove foreign influences was specific to that stage of redemptive history, the principle of wholehearted dedication resonates for believers through the teachings of Christ, who invites His disciples to surrender everything to God’s lordship (Luke 14:33). In failing to do so, Israel would see that incomplete obedience allowed the seeds of compromise to take root and, in due course, influence their national destiny.