This passage highlights the contrast between earthly might and divine sovereignty.
Balak, king of Moab, confronts the prophet Balaam with an urgent tone, and Scripture narrates: Then Balak said to Balaam, “Did I not urgently send to you to call you? Why did you not come to me? Am I really unable to honor you?” (v.37). Balak ruled the Moabites in the mid-to-late 15th century BC, around the time the Israelites were nearing the end of their journey through the wilderness (Numbers 22-25). Historically, this places Balak and Balaam in an era just before the Israelites would enter the land of Canaan (around 1406 BC). Balak’s question reveals a hint of exasperation and desperation—he had repeatedly asked Balaam to come, hoping to secure a curse against Israel, yet Balaam’s delay and apparent reluctance caused the king to fear a loss of influence.
In calling out Balaam, Balak says: “Why did you not come to me? Am I really unable to honor you?” (v.37). The “honor” Balak intends to bestow likely refers to material wealth, status, or royal favor. Balak’s statement shows a worldly view of power, one that attempts to sway a prophet through earthly gifts. Balaam, however, is constrained by the fact that his prophetic words depend on God’s permission and guidance (Numbers 22:18). Even when pressured by temporal rulers, the true prophetic message cannot be altered for personal gain—a theme later echoed by Jesus, who taught that one cannot serve both God and wealth (Matthew 6:24).
Balak continues to emphasize his own authority, yet the real authority in this story lies with God. The king’s question highlights a universal tension: people in positions of leadership often assume that gifting or honoring someone will ensure obedience. Balaam’s resistance—though mixed with his own struggles—demonstrates that God’s will supersedes a human ruler’s demands.
Set to dark mode
Numbers 22:37 meaning
Balak, king of Moab, confronts the prophet Balaam with an urgent tone, and Scripture narrates: Then Balak said to Balaam, “Did I not urgently send to you to call you? Why did you not come to me? Am I really unable to honor you?” (v.37). Balak ruled the Moabites in the mid-to-late 15th century BC, around the time the Israelites were nearing the end of their journey through the wilderness (Numbers 22-25). Historically, this places Balak and Balaam in an era just before the Israelites would enter the land of Canaan (around 1406 BC). Balak’s question reveals a hint of exasperation and desperation—he had repeatedly asked Balaam to come, hoping to secure a curse against Israel, yet Balaam’s delay and apparent reluctance caused the king to fear a loss of influence.
In calling out Balaam, Balak says: “Why did you not come to me? Am I really unable to honor you?” (v.37). The “honor” Balak intends to bestow likely refers to material wealth, status, or royal favor. Balak’s statement shows a worldly view of power, one that attempts to sway a prophet through earthly gifts. Balaam, however, is constrained by the fact that his prophetic words depend on God’s permission and guidance (Numbers 22:18). Even when pressured by temporal rulers, the true prophetic message cannot be altered for personal gain—a theme later echoed by Jesus, who taught that one cannot serve both God and wealth (Matthew 6:24).
Balak continues to emphasize his own authority, yet the real authority in this story lies with God. The king’s question highlights a universal tension: people in positions of leadership often assume that gifting or honoring someone will ensure obedience. Balaam’s resistance—though mixed with his own struggles—demonstrates that God’s will supersedes a human ruler’s demands.