A turning point revealing Israel’s fracture and the establishment of Jeroboam’s rule in the north underlines the complexity of political and spiritual divisions in biblical history.
“It came about, when all Israel heard that Jeroboam had returned, that they sent and called him to the assembly and made him king over all Israel. None but the tribe of Judah followed the house of David.” (v.20)
This verse describes a pivotal moment in the history of the Israelite monarchy. In “It came about, when all Israel heard that Jeroboam had returned” (v.20), we see the people learning that Jeroboam, who had previously fled to Egypt during King Solomon’s reign, is back in their land. Geographically, “all Israel” in this context refers to the Northern regions that encompassed the majority of the tribes, including the regions later identified with capitals like Shechem and Samaria. Jeroboam (around 930-910 BC) emerges as a key figure in Israel’s timeline, rising to lead the fractured northern tribes. His significance lies not only in his rule but also in his role as the first king of the separated northern kingdom, marking a shift away from King David’s united monarchy (1010-970 BC) and King Solomon’s subsequent reign (970-930 BC).
Next, the verse states that “they sent and called him to the assembly and made him king over all Israel” (v.20), indicating a deliberate decision by the people to enthrone Jeroboam. This highlights how Israel, apart from Judah, sought a ruler whom they believed would better represent their interests—a sharp break from the heir to Solomon’s throne, Rehoboam. Historically, this event signifies the establishment of the Northern Kingdom, contrasted with the Southern Kingdom where only Judah (and later partially Benjamin) remained loyal to David’s lineage. The narrative underscores the theme of division and the people’s choice to anoint a king outside the Davidic line in hopes of finding relief from burden and heavy labor. As future prophets would repeatedly address, this break eventually led to spiritual and political challenges, foreshadowing the varied legacy of Jeroboam’s leadership (2 Kings 17:21-23).
Finally, the verse concludes with the statement “None but the tribe of Judah followed the house of David” (v.20). This draws a firm line between the newly formed bulk of northern tribes and the southern kingdom, centered in Jerusalem, which was home to God’s temple and seat of the Davidic monarchy. By isolating the tribe of Judah in loyalty to the house of David, the Scripture emphasizes that God’s promise to preserve David’s lineage (2 Samuel 7:16) remains intact despite the political shake-up. In the New Testament, Jesus, who is also of David’s lineage, invites all people into a unified kingdom under God (Matthew 1:1), contrasting with the fractured kingdoms seen here.
Set to dark mode
1 Kings 12:20 meaning
“It came about, when all Israel heard that Jeroboam had returned, that they sent and called him to the assembly and made him king over all Israel. None but the tribe of Judah followed the house of David.” (v.20)
This verse describes a pivotal moment in the history of the Israelite monarchy. In “It came about, when all Israel heard that Jeroboam had returned” (v.20), we see the people learning that Jeroboam, who had previously fled to Egypt during King Solomon’s reign, is back in their land. Geographically, “all Israel” in this context refers to the Northern regions that encompassed the majority of the tribes, including the regions later identified with capitals like Shechem and Samaria. Jeroboam (around 930-910 BC) emerges as a key figure in Israel’s timeline, rising to lead the fractured northern tribes. His significance lies not only in his rule but also in his role as the first king of the separated northern kingdom, marking a shift away from King David’s united monarchy (1010-970 BC) and King Solomon’s subsequent reign (970-930 BC).
Next, the verse states that “they sent and called him to the assembly and made him king over all Israel” (v.20), indicating a deliberate decision by the people to enthrone Jeroboam. This highlights how Israel, apart from Judah, sought a ruler whom they believed would better represent their interests—a sharp break from the heir to Solomon’s throne, Rehoboam. Historically, this event signifies the establishment of the Northern Kingdom, contrasted with the Southern Kingdom where only Judah (and later partially Benjamin) remained loyal to David’s lineage. The narrative underscores the theme of division and the people’s choice to anoint a king outside the Davidic line in hopes of finding relief from burden and heavy labor. As future prophets would repeatedly address, this break eventually led to spiritual and political challenges, foreshadowing the varied legacy of Jeroboam’s leadership (2 Kings 17:21-23).
Finally, the verse concludes with the statement “None but the tribe of Judah followed the house of David” (v.20). This draws a firm line between the newly formed bulk of northern tribes and the southern kingdom, centered in Jerusalem, which was home to God’s temple and seat of the Davidic monarchy. By isolating the tribe of Judah in loyalty to the house of David, the Scripture emphasizes that God’s promise to preserve David’s lineage (2 Samuel 7:16) remains intact despite the political shake-up. In the New Testament, Jesus, who is also of David’s lineage, invites all people into a unified kingdom under God (Matthew 1:1), contrasting with the fractured kingdoms seen here.