The younger prophet’s downfall is a stark warning that disobedience to God’s command invites dire consequences.
“Now when the prophet who brought him back from the way heard it, he said, ‘It is the man of God, who disobeyed the command of the LORD; therefore the LORD has given him to the lion, which has torn him and killed him, according to the word of the LORD which He spoke to him.’” (v.26). These words describe the moment an older prophet from Bethel learns of the tragic death of a younger prophet, referred to here as the “man of God.” The setting appears to be near Bethel, a key religious site in the northern kingdom of Israel. At that time, Israel was ruled by King Jeroboam (931 - 910 BC), following the nation’s division after Solomon’s reign. The older prophet acknowledges that the younger man met his end from a lion because he disregarded the divine warnings given to him—a violation that underscores God’s unchanging standard of obedience.
When the prophet who brought him back from the way heard it (v.26), he recognized that the punishment came precisely because the younger prophet failed to adhere to the direct word from the LORD. Even though this older prophet initially deceived the younger man (1 Kings 13:18) by claiming angelic revelation, the responsibility for obedience ultimately rested on the younger prophet himself. His disobedience led to severe consequences, illustrating the seriousness that God places upon His commands. In the Old Testament, God’s people were especially accountable to follow His instructions fully (Deuteronomy 28:1), with blessings for obedience and curses for disobedience.
He said, “It is the man of God, who disobeyed the command of the LORD; therefore the LORD has given him to the lion” (v.26). This statement reveals that the older prophet understands God’s sovereignty to allow calamity in response to willful rebellion. Christians in the New Testament can observe a parallel in Jesus’ emphasis on abiding in His word and obeying His commands (John 15:10). While the modes of punishment differ under the New Covenant, the principle of recognizing the authority of God’s word remains. We see in this account the unfolding of God’s faithful word, which the younger prophet had once proclaimed but then failed to heed personally—an important reminder that one’s personal obedience is deeply intertwined with their message to others.
Set to dark mode
1 Kings 13:26 meaning
“Now when the prophet who brought him back from the way heard it, he said, ‘It is the man of God, who disobeyed the command of the LORD; therefore the LORD has given him to the lion, which has torn him and killed him, according to the word of the LORD which He spoke to him.’” (v.26). These words describe the moment an older prophet from Bethel learns of the tragic death of a younger prophet, referred to here as the “man of God.” The setting appears to be near Bethel, a key religious site in the northern kingdom of Israel. At that time, Israel was ruled by King Jeroboam (931 - 910 BC), following the nation’s division after Solomon’s reign. The older prophet acknowledges that the younger man met his end from a lion because he disregarded the divine warnings given to him—a violation that underscores God’s unchanging standard of obedience.
When the prophet who brought him back from the way heard it (v.26), he recognized that the punishment came precisely because the younger prophet failed to adhere to the direct word from the LORD. Even though this older prophet initially deceived the younger man (1 Kings 13:18) by claiming angelic revelation, the responsibility for obedience ultimately rested on the younger prophet himself. His disobedience led to severe consequences, illustrating the seriousness that God places upon His commands. In the Old Testament, God’s people were especially accountable to follow His instructions fully (Deuteronomy 28:1), with blessings for obedience and curses for disobedience.
He said, “It is the man of God, who disobeyed the command of the LORD; therefore the LORD has given him to the lion” (v.26). This statement reveals that the older prophet understands God’s sovereignty to allow calamity in response to willful rebellion. Christians in the New Testament can observe a parallel in Jesus’ emphasis on abiding in His word and obeying His commands (John 15:10). While the modes of punishment differ under the New Covenant, the principle of recognizing the authority of God’s word remains. We see in this account the unfolding of God’s faithful word, which the younger prophet had once proclaimed but then failed to heed personally—an important reminder that one’s personal obedience is deeply intertwined with their message to others.