Rehoboam maintained control over Judah even though the northern tribes rebelled and established their own kingdom.
In this passage, we read how “But as for the sons of Israel who lived in the cities of Judah, Rehoboam reigned over them” (v.17). These words occur after a heated exchange in which Rehoboam, son of King Solomon (who ruled around 970-930 BC), fails to respond graciously to the call for leniency from the northern tribes. Consequently, the kingdom is torn apart, with Rehoboam only retaining authority over the southern region. By stating that “Rehoboam reigned over them” (v.17), the chronicler underscores how the southern tribe of Judah (and those who dwelt there) still recognized Rehoboam’s leadership, despite the fracture in the broader Israelite kingdom.
This territorial division took place around the critical point where the united monarchy under David (who lived approximately 1040-970 BC) and Solomon collapsed. Geographically, Judah was the southern portion of the once-united Israel, with Jerusalem as its central city. The “cities of Judah” (v.17) would have included smaller towns and settlements in this southern kingdom, reinforcing how Rehoboam continued to rule at least part of the people. Although the Bible highlights the acrimony of this division, it also shows God’s unfolding plan despite human failures, a motif we see woven throughout Scripture.
From a broader biblical perspective, the southern kingdom under Rehoboam would later be the line from which the Messiah, Jesus Christ, would one day be born (Matthew 1:7). This unexpected continuity, hinted at in “But as for the sons of Israel who lived in the cities of Judah” (v.17), points to the sovereignty of God over history, ensuring His purposes were carried out even when human governance faltered.
Set to dark mode
2 Chronicles 10:17 meaning
In this passage, we read how “But as for the sons of Israel who lived in the cities of Judah, Rehoboam reigned over them” (v.17). These words occur after a heated exchange in which Rehoboam, son of King Solomon (who ruled around 970-930 BC), fails to respond graciously to the call for leniency from the northern tribes. Consequently, the kingdom is torn apart, with Rehoboam only retaining authority over the southern region. By stating that “Rehoboam reigned over them” (v.17), the chronicler underscores how the southern tribe of Judah (and those who dwelt there) still recognized Rehoboam’s leadership, despite the fracture in the broader Israelite kingdom.
This territorial division took place around the critical point where the united monarchy under David (who lived approximately 1040-970 BC) and Solomon collapsed. Geographically, Judah was the southern portion of the once-united Israel, with Jerusalem as its central city. The “cities of Judah” (v.17) would have included smaller towns and settlements in this southern kingdom, reinforcing how Rehoboam continued to rule at least part of the people. Although the Bible highlights the acrimony of this division, it also shows God’s unfolding plan despite human failures, a motif we see woven throughout Scripture.
From a broader biblical perspective, the southern kingdom under Rehoboam would later be the line from which the Messiah, Jesus Christ, would one day be born (Matthew 1:7). This unexpected continuity, hinted at in “But as for the sons of Israel who lived in the cities of Judah” (v.17), points to the sovereignty of God over history, ensuring His purposes were carried out even when human governance faltered.