Ahaz’s dishonorable burial underscores the unfortunate end of a king who failed to follow God’s ways.
In recounting the end of King Ahaz’s life, the Chronicler writes that “Ahaz slept with his fathers, and they buried him in the city, in Jerusalem, for they did not bring him into the tombs of the kings of Israel; and Hezekiah his son reigned in his place” (v.27). These words describe both the physical location of King Ahaz’s burial and the spiritual implications of his reign. Ahaz (who reigned from around 735 BC to 715 BC) was part of the Davidic lineage, yet his idolatrous behavior set him apart from the faithful legacy established by King David. Jerusalem, the royal city in the southern kingdom of Judah, served as the focal point of God’s covenant promise through David’s lineage, making Ahaz’s separate burial outside the tombs of the kings particularly noteworthy.
The phrase “they did not bring him into the tombs of the kings of Israel” (v.27) shows that Ahaz’s death was met with disappointment and even dishonor. Contrary to the honor given to righteous leaders, this exclusion emphasized that his leadership deviated from the Lord’s ways. Historically, failing to be buried among the kings signified a ruler who lost the respect of his people and whose faithlessness clouded the legacy he left behind. When rulers like David or Josiah were buried with honor, it underscored their faithfulness. But for Ahaz, his idolatrous practices led to a dishonorable conclusion.
Finally, the text says, “…and Hezekiah his son reigned in his place” (v.27). This transition denotes hope, as Hezekiah (reigning circa 715 BC to 686 BC) would become one of Judah’s more faithful kings, striving to restore proper worship in the temple and influence the nation back toward God 2 Chronicles 29). Notably, both Ahaz and Hezekiah appear in the genealogy of Jesus in Matthew 1:9, serving as a reminder that God’s redemptive plan can unfold even through flawed individuals in the line of David.
Set to dark mode
2 Chronicles 28:27 meaning
In recounting the end of King Ahaz’s life, the Chronicler writes that “Ahaz slept with his fathers, and they buried him in the city, in Jerusalem, for they did not bring him into the tombs of the kings of Israel; and Hezekiah his son reigned in his place” (v.27). These words describe both the physical location of King Ahaz’s burial and the spiritual implications of his reign. Ahaz (who reigned from around 735 BC to 715 BC) was part of the Davidic lineage, yet his idolatrous behavior set him apart from the faithful legacy established by King David. Jerusalem, the royal city in the southern kingdom of Judah, served as the focal point of God’s covenant promise through David’s lineage, making Ahaz’s separate burial outside the tombs of the kings particularly noteworthy.
The phrase “they did not bring him into the tombs of the kings of Israel” (v.27) shows that Ahaz’s death was met with disappointment and even dishonor. Contrary to the honor given to righteous leaders, this exclusion emphasized that his leadership deviated from the Lord’s ways. Historically, failing to be buried among the kings signified a ruler who lost the respect of his people and whose faithlessness clouded the legacy he left behind. When rulers like David or Josiah were buried with honor, it underscored their faithfulness. But for Ahaz, his idolatrous practices led to a dishonorable conclusion.
Finally, the text says, “…and Hezekiah his son reigned in his place” (v.27). This transition denotes hope, as Hezekiah (reigning circa 715 BC to 686 BC) would become one of Judah’s more faithful kings, striving to restore proper worship in the temple and influence the nation back toward God 2 Chronicles 29). Notably, both Ahaz and Hezekiah appear in the genealogy of Jesus in Matthew 1:9, serving as a reminder that God’s redemptive plan can unfold even through flawed individuals in the line of David.