This verse underscores how God’s sovereign purposes often work through challenges and the rise of new kings.
“When Hazael king of Aram died, Ben-hadad his son became king in his place.” (v.24) This verse provides a brief but significant transition in Aram’s leadership from Hazael to his son Ben-hadad. Aram, also known as Syria, stood north of Israel, with Damascus as its major city and political center. Hazael, who ruled from around 841 BC to approximately 801 BC, had come to power under prophetic circumstances (see 2 Kings 8:7-15), and he frequently opposed Israel, contributing to various conflicts during the era. His death marks the close of a tumultuous chapter as the kingdom of Aram changes hands, paving the way for a new chapter under Ben-hadad’s leadership.
By stating that “When Hazael king of Aram died, Ben-hadad his son became king in his place” (v.24), Scripture shows a continuation of the same threat Israel had faced under Hazael. This familial line of succession in ancient Near Eastern culture preserved policies, alliances, and hostilities, including aggression against Israel (2 Kings 13:22). The passage underlines that God remains sovereign over the rise and fall of nations, a theme echoing throughout the Bible (Acts 17:26). Just as the Lord allowed Hazael to grow in power, so He also permitted his son to reign, signaling that God’s purposes hold firm regardless of which human agents ascend to the throne.
Ben-hadad himself would grow into a figure of significance, maintaining Aram’s capacity as a rival to Israel. In the broader biblical narrative, kingdoms like Aram frequently highlight God’s consistent intervention and redemptive plan, culminating in the work of Jesus Christ (Luke 1:52). Even in the persistent conflicts and power shifts of the Old Testament, the Lord’s overarching plan points forward to a hope that transcends political changes.
Set to dark mode
2 Kings 13:24 meaning
“When Hazael king of Aram died, Ben-hadad his son became king in his place.” (v.24) This verse provides a brief but significant transition in Aram’s leadership from Hazael to his son Ben-hadad. Aram, also known as Syria, stood north of Israel, with Damascus as its major city and political center. Hazael, who ruled from around 841 BC to approximately 801 BC, had come to power under prophetic circumstances (see 2 Kings 8:7-15), and he frequently opposed Israel, contributing to various conflicts during the era. His death marks the close of a tumultuous chapter as the kingdom of Aram changes hands, paving the way for a new chapter under Ben-hadad’s leadership.
By stating that “When Hazael king of Aram died, Ben-hadad his son became king in his place” (v.24), Scripture shows a continuation of the same threat Israel had faced under Hazael. This familial line of succession in ancient Near Eastern culture preserved policies, alliances, and hostilities, including aggression against Israel (2 Kings 13:22). The passage underlines that God remains sovereign over the rise and fall of nations, a theme echoing throughout the Bible (Acts 17:26). Just as the Lord allowed Hazael to grow in power, so He also permitted his son to reign, signaling that God’s purposes hold firm regardless of which human agents ascend to the throne.
Ben-hadad himself would grow into a figure of significance, maintaining Aram’s capacity as a rival to Israel. In the broader biblical narrative, kingdoms like Aram frequently highlight God’s consistent intervention and redemptive plan, culminating in the work of Jesus Christ (Luke 1:52). Even in the persistent conflicts and power shifts of the Old Testament, the Lord’s overarching plan points forward to a hope that transcends political changes.