Laban reminds Jacob that the people and possessions he gained came from Laban’s household, but he also concedes that God’s will ultimately determines where they belong.
Then Laban replied to Jacob, “The daughters are my daughters, and the children are my children, and the flocks are my flocks, and all that you see is mine; but what can I do this day to these my daughters or to their children whom they have borne?” (Genesis 31:43). Laban responds to Jacob’s departure with a profound sense of ownership and authority, reminding Jacob that his two wives, Rachel and Leah, were originally Laban’s daughters, and any children borne to them belong to Laban in his mind. At this juncture in the narrative—around the early second millennium BC—Laban, who lived in Haran (modern-day Turkey or northern Mesopotamia), stands in a position of power since he provided Jacob with his wives and much of his wealth. Yet Laban also voices resignation, admitting he has limited power to reclaim what he believes is his by right.
We see in the daughters are my daughters (v.43) a clash between familial relationships and individual autonomy. Historically, Laban is Rebekah’s brother and thus Jacob’s maternal uncle, situating him in the lineage that began with Abraham (born around 2166 BC) and continued through Isaac, Jacob’s father. By highlighting that the flocks are my flocks, and all that you see is mine (v.43), Laban seeks to emphasize how Jacob’s blessings originated from Laban’s household. However, the deeper biblical narrative reveals that it is ultimately the LORD who grants blessings and orchestrates destinies (Romans 8:28). Although Laban claims ownership, God stands as the true provider.
Finally, Laban’s rhetorical question—but what can I do this day to these my daughters or to their children whom they have borne? (v.43)—shows he understands the delicate position he is in. While he perceives that he has rightful claim over Jacob’s family and wealth, he recognizes that his own daughters and grandchildren have chosen a new path. In a broader biblical context, this moment foreshadows God’s plans for Jacob, whose name will soon become Israel and whose descendants point to Jesus Christ in the New Testament (Matthew 1:2). Laban’s admission here is one more step toward severing ties and allowing Jacob to pursue the covenant promises.
Genesis 31:43 meaning
Then Laban replied to Jacob, “The daughters are my daughters, and the children are my children, and the flocks are my flocks, and all that you see is mine; but what can I do this day to these my daughters or to their children whom they have borne?” (Genesis 31:43). Laban responds to Jacob’s departure with a profound sense of ownership and authority, reminding Jacob that his two wives, Rachel and Leah, were originally Laban’s daughters, and any children borne to them belong to Laban in his mind. At this juncture in the narrative—around the early second millennium BC—Laban, who lived in Haran (modern-day Turkey or northern Mesopotamia), stands in a position of power since he provided Jacob with his wives and much of his wealth. Yet Laban also voices resignation, admitting he has limited power to reclaim what he believes is his by right.
We see in the daughters are my daughters (v.43) a clash between familial relationships and individual autonomy. Historically, Laban is Rebekah’s brother and thus Jacob’s maternal uncle, situating him in the lineage that began with Abraham (born around 2166 BC) and continued through Isaac, Jacob’s father. By highlighting that the flocks are my flocks, and all that you see is mine (v.43), Laban seeks to emphasize how Jacob’s blessings originated from Laban’s household. However, the deeper biblical narrative reveals that it is ultimately the LORD who grants blessings and orchestrates destinies (Romans 8:28). Although Laban claims ownership, God stands as the true provider.
Finally, Laban’s rhetorical question—but what can I do this day to these my daughters or to their children whom they have borne? (v.43)—shows he understands the delicate position he is in. While he perceives that he has rightful claim over Jacob’s family and wealth, he recognizes that his own daughters and grandchildren have chosen a new path. In a broader biblical context, this moment foreshadows God’s plans for Jacob, whose name will soon become Israel and whose descendants point to Jesus Christ in the New Testament (Matthew 1:2). Laban’s admission here is one more step toward severing ties and allowing Jacob to pursue the covenant promises.