The leaders of the eastern tribes built an altar to preserve unity with their brothers and to testify that they shared the same covenant God, not to lead a rebellion.
“Thus says the whole congregation of the LORD, ‘What is this unfaithful act which you have committed against the God of Israel, turning away from following the LORD this day, by building yourselves an altar, to rebel against the LORD this day?’” (v.16). This statement is made after the tribes of Reuben, Gad, and the half-tribe of Manasseh, who settled on the eastern side of the Jordan, constructed an imposing altar upon returning to their homes. The remaining Israelites in the western regions interpreted this altar as a potential break in Israel’s covenant allegiance to God. Fearing that this construction signaled idol worship or a separate system of sacrifice, the offended Israelites confronted these eastern tribes with a sharp rebuke, calling it an “unfaithful act.” They believed that building another altar beyond the approved bronze altar in the tabernacle (Deuteronomy 12:13-14) might bring divine judgment upon the entire nation.
The phrase turning away from following the LORD underscores a core fear of apostasy—drifting from the singular worship of the God of Israel. Since the Suzerain LORD had delivered them into the Promised Land, the thought of fracturing worship practices by constructing a new altar felt akin to open rebellion. Tensions ran high because all Israel knew well the consequences of covenant unfaithfulness, including the possibility of God’s discipline on the community. The tribes on the east side of the Jordan (Reuben, Gad, and the half-tribe of Manasseh) were particularly vulnerable, having chosen to settle outside the heartland of Canaan. Later in biblical history, these same tribes were indeed the first to be exiled, highlighting that distance could lead to spiritual as well as physical separation.
However, as the account continues in Joshua 22, the eastern tribes explained that their motive was not rebellion. Rather, they intended the altar to serve as a witness of unity between them and the rest of Israel, ensuring future generations would remember they, too, belonged to the people of the LORD. Their concern was that later Israelites might forget these two-and-a-half tribes belonged within the covenant and shared in Israel’s worship of God. By clarifying this to the western Israelites, the conflict was resolved, and the fellowship among the tribes continued.
Set to dark mode
Joshua 22:16 meaning
“Thus says the whole congregation of the LORD, ‘What is this unfaithful act which you have committed against the God of Israel, turning away from following the LORD this day, by building yourselves an altar, to rebel against the LORD this day?’” (v.16). This statement is made after the tribes of Reuben, Gad, and the half-tribe of Manasseh, who settled on the eastern side of the Jordan, constructed an imposing altar upon returning to their homes. The remaining Israelites in the western regions interpreted this altar as a potential break in Israel’s covenant allegiance to God. Fearing that this construction signaled idol worship or a separate system of sacrifice, the offended Israelites confronted these eastern tribes with a sharp rebuke, calling it an “unfaithful act.” They believed that building another altar beyond the approved bronze altar in the tabernacle (Deuteronomy 12:13-14) might bring divine judgment upon the entire nation.
The phrase turning away from following the LORD underscores a core fear of apostasy—drifting from the singular worship of the God of Israel. Since the Suzerain LORD had delivered them into the Promised Land, the thought of fracturing worship practices by constructing a new altar felt akin to open rebellion. Tensions ran high because all Israel knew well the consequences of covenant unfaithfulness, including the possibility of God’s discipline on the community. The tribes on the east side of the Jordan (Reuben, Gad, and the half-tribe of Manasseh) were particularly vulnerable, having chosen to settle outside the heartland of Canaan. Later in biblical history, these same tribes were indeed the first to be exiled, highlighting that distance could lead to spiritual as well as physical separation.
However, as the account continues in Joshua 22, the eastern tribes explained that their motive was not rebellion. Rather, they intended the altar to serve as a witness of unity between them and the rest of Israel, ensuring future generations would remember they, too, belonged to the people of the LORD. Their concern was that later Israelites might forget these two-and-a-half tribes belonged within the covenant and shared in Israel’s worship of God. By clarifying this to the western Israelites, the conflict was resolved, and the fellowship among the tribes continued.