Joram died, and his son Ahaziah became king, continuing Judah’s royal line despite an era of unfaithfulness.
Joram’s life comes to an end in the middle of conflict and shifting alliances, as the text explains: So Joram slept with his fathers and was buried with his fathers in the city of David, and Ahaziah his son became king in his place (v. 24). Joram is also called Jehoram in some passages (2 Kings 8:21), reflecting the varied spelling of his name across Hebrew texts. He was a king of Judah and a direct descendant of King David, hence he was buried “in the city of David,” meaning Jerusalem. His reign, which biblical history places around 848-841 BC, was characterized by entanglements with the northern kingdom of Israel through his marriage to Athaliah, daughter of Ahab and Jezebel. This alliance brought idolatry into Judah, setting the stage for turmoil (2 Kings 8:18).
By noting that Joram slept with his fathers, the Scripture uses a customary Hebrew expression to signify that he died and joined his ancestors in death. His burial “in the city of David” underscores that, despite his troubling legacy, Joram was still of royal lineage—a grandson of the godly King Jehoshaphat—and thus received a royal burial. The verse then shifts attention to the immediate outcome of his passing: Ahaziah his son became king in his place (v. 24). Ahaziah, who was the son of Joram and Athaliah, assumed power but only reigned for one year (2 Kings 8:25-29), indicating that he too faced the consequences of a kingdom weakened by spiritual compromise.
In terms of theological meaning, 2 Kings 8:24 provides an important reminder of how leadership transitions can be a turning point for an entire people. Although Joram was a Davidic king tasked with reflecting God’s standards, his choices brought spiritual decline that spilled into his son’s reign. The “city of David” serves here both as a literal burial place and a symbolic representation of the covenant promise that David’s lineage would continue. Yet the verse also hints that a royal lineage alone cannot ensure righteousness; each king must choose whom he will serve.
Set to dark mode
2 Kings 8:24 meaning
Joram’s life comes to an end in the middle of conflict and shifting alliances, as the text explains: So Joram slept with his fathers and was buried with his fathers in the city of David, and Ahaziah his son became king in his place (v. 24). Joram is also called Jehoram in some passages (2 Kings 8:21), reflecting the varied spelling of his name across Hebrew texts. He was a king of Judah and a direct descendant of King David, hence he was buried “in the city of David,” meaning Jerusalem. His reign, which biblical history places around 848-841 BC, was characterized by entanglements with the northern kingdom of Israel through his marriage to Athaliah, daughter of Ahab and Jezebel. This alliance brought idolatry into Judah, setting the stage for turmoil (2 Kings 8:18).
By noting that Joram slept with his fathers, the Scripture uses a customary Hebrew expression to signify that he died and joined his ancestors in death. His burial “in the city of David” underscores that, despite his troubling legacy, Joram was still of royal lineage—a grandson of the godly King Jehoshaphat—and thus received a royal burial. The verse then shifts attention to the immediate outcome of his passing: Ahaziah his son became king in his place (v. 24). Ahaziah, who was the son of Joram and Athaliah, assumed power but only reigned for one year (2 Kings 8:25-29), indicating that he too faced the consequences of a kingdom weakened by spiritual compromise.
In terms of theological meaning, 2 Kings 8:24 provides an important reminder of how leadership transitions can be a turning point for an entire people. Although Joram was a Davidic king tasked with reflecting God’s standards, his choices brought spiritual decline that spilled into his son’s reign. The “city of David” serves here both as a literal burial place and a symbolic representation of the covenant promise that David’s lineage would continue. Yet the verse also hints that a royal lineage alone cannot ensure righteousness; each king must choose whom he will serve.