Select Language
AaSelect font sizeDark ModeSet to dark mode

2 Kings 8 Commentary

Please choose a passage

2 Kings 8:1 meaning

Elisha warns the Shunammite woman to depart from Israel before the seven-year famine, exemplifying God’s gracious provision and His prophet’s faithful guidance.

2 Kings 8:2 meaning

She obeyed the prophet Elisha, took her family to the land of the Philistines for seven years to escape famine, and trusted God’s plan for protection and eventual return.

2 Kings 8:3 meaning

She faithfully returned and sought what she had lost.

2 Kings 8:4 meaning

This verse reveals the king’s curiosity about God’s power, sets the stage for further restoration events, and emphasizes how Elisha’s ministry impacted even the highest levels of authority.

2 Kings 8:5 meaning

This verse shows that God’s providence can appear at just the right time to renew hope and supply our needs.

2 Kings 8:6 meaning

God’s faithfulness is evident as He uses rulers and events for His people’s benefit.

2 Kings 8:7 meaning

Elisha’s visit to the Aramean king sets the stage for upcoming political and prophetic developments in Israel’s history.

2 Kings 8:8 meaning

Ben-hadad, though not a follower of the God of Israel, sought help and answers from His prophet.

2 Kings 8:9 meaning

This verse depicts Hazael’s visit to Elisha, bearing abundant gifts from Damascus on behalf of a gravely ill King Ben-hadad, illustrating the far-reaching influence of God’s prophet and foreshadowing Hazael’s own future rule.

This verse demonstrates God’s sovereignty over both sickness and political transitions.

This verse reminds us that God’s people sometimes see a coming tragedy and are moved to tears of sorrow.

This verse foretells the grievous destruction that a future king will inflict on Israel, highlighting the profound sorrow of Elisha and the devastating cycle of sin and judgment.

Hazael’s humble surprise foreshadows the significant, and at times ruthless, reign he would have as king.

Briefly, this verse highlights Hazael’s deceptive response to King Ben-hadad, revealing a pivotal moment that foreshadows his rise to power.

This verse underscores Hazael’s betrayal and the swift transition of power in Aram.

Jehoram’s ascension in Judah amid Joram’s reign in Israel marks a key leadership shift that foretells the southern kingdom’s spiritual challenges.

Though Jehoram’s age and length of reign appear brief in Scripture, they reflect significant choices affecting Judah’s destiny.

Jehoram’s decision to emulate the ways of Ahab led Judah into deeper spiritual decline.

God’s unbreakable promise to David ensured that Judah endured in spite of human fallibility.

Edom’s rebellion under Jehoram shows how turning away from God leads to national weakness and the loss of spiritual influence.

Joram’s costly attempt to retain Edom only partially succeeded and revealed the kingdom’s diminishing power.

Edom’s and Libnah’s revolts underscore the fragility of human institutions without God’s guidance.

Joram’s record shows the importance of each person’s legacy under God’s watchful authority.

Joram died, and his son Ahaziah became king, continuing Judah’s royal line despite an era of unfaithfulness.

This verse highlights the dynastic transition in Judah under God’s overarching timeline.

Ahaziah’s short rule highlights the transient nature of human power.

This verse reveals that choices grounded in ungodly alliances often lead to destructive consequences.

They wage war together, yet it is clear that Joram’s injury signals further instability to come.

King Joram, wounded and seeking recovery, becomes an example of how earthly power cannot shield rulers from life’s uncertainties.